“The goal was to get Larry’s perspective on his Supreme Court case…live.”
(NOTE: video at end of scroll)
Larry Flynt, at thirty four, with no expression on his face under bright red hair, walked out of the Beverly Hilton Hotel in a white tailored outfit, the shirt having no buttons, an open collar over pants flowing down and flaring wide enough to cover his shoes. With him was his brother James and Jean-Louis Ginibre, the editor of the new magazine Larry would publish from California.
I had worked with Jean-Louis in Paris and Chicago adapting the French magazine Lui for Playboy as Oui.
Chic was glamorously oversize yet Larry’s sense of humor and satire was not lost.
The big format photography was retouched in Switzerland directly on larger color separation transparencies made from the photographs taken by the French photographers and the magazine was printed by the best.
I used the best illustrators and had most of the titles for articles hand lettered.
It was not cheap.
Chic was closed.
Years later Bruce David asked me to help create another publication for Flynt that was to be “not your father’s Playboy.” Rage.
Rage too was closed. But not until we all created some of our best editorial work. About 2000 Bruce and I teamed up again to redesign Hustler, which was aging in look at that time.
Between Chic and Rage a lot happened in Larry Flynt’s life.
A group of creative friends– art director Mark Francolini and writer Nelson Quintal of Toronto, writer/director Alan Metter, all around film guy Greg McClatchy (who did the preliminary edit), and cinematographer Kevin Donovan — came in with me to put this interview on film. Greg McClatchy, Ben Fine, Ted Woods and Lorraine Devon Wilke came in later to do titles, editing, and general technical assistance.
We did it for posterity. For future reference. For a good time.
The goal was to get Larry’s perspective on his Supreme Court case LIVE – the one that was the basis of the film, The People vs. Larry Flynt – and my involvement (with writer Terry Abrahamson) in that infamous case.
The rest of it? Off the cuff Larry, some of it prompted by the interviewers (the director, though, thanks him for the compliments).
With what is going on with the Supreme Court and the First Amendment cases currently before it, it’s worthwhile to revisit Larry’s case. The Hustler Magazine parody of Jerry Falwell we created was deemed to be within the law because the Court found that reasonable people would not have interpreted the parody to contain factual claims. Is an obvious parody the same as what these zealots are doing “demobstrating” at the funerals of fallen soldiers?
CLICK BELOW FOR LARRY FLYNT INTERVIEW:
* * * * * * * * * * *
Nice piece. Funny thing is, I start watching Larry and he’s kinda smiling and I just start smiling. I paid some rent with a couple of days or a week’s worth of CHIC proceeds back in 1977, so I got that debt 0′ gratitude for the Flynt Empire trickle-down. Thanks for sharing. I’m still smiling. Ken A.
Thanks for the ink. Where’s my check? Terry A.
OK, so with the long list of people you have met, who is the one person you haven’t and would like to? Sergio B.
This is very cool – so great. S. Geffen
Very interesting, Mike. One of those things in life: to have been places when things happened but even more than that, to be awake and aware most of the time. Memory has very little to with just remembering things — much much more about having understood stuff enough to make a worthwhile comparison between then and now. It’ is the “processing” which is enduring – the past and the present are gone even before one becomes aware of them. Philip C.
Amazing piece. Amazing time and achievements. Wonderful tribute to be distilled down, defined and quoted as “always thinking.” Impressive and enjoyable, a little intense, yet fun! Thanks for sending it along, Mike. Linda K.
Fuckin’ A…always thinking. Humpydogg